Why Effective Testing For Buprenorphine Requires A 5ng|mL Cutoff Level To Report The Most Accurate Results
What Is Buprenorphine
Although buprenorphine was intended as a treatment to help people get off of heroin, it has quickly become a popular recreational drug for an assortment of reasons. It is an inexpensive drug to buy on the street and easier to find than heroin and other opiates. Plus, it can be purchased at a more affordable price.
Some people use it as a temporary fix until they can purchase their drug of choice. It creates a euphoria high for many people, especially new users, and for those who are taking it instead of heroin, it is a cost effective option. Buprenorphine is less likely to be adulterated than heroin, and there is less likelihood for an overdose.
Effects At Low Dosages
5ng/mL vs 10ng/mL Cuttoff Levels
As a point of proof as to whether buprenorphine testing is more accurate at lower cutoff levels — In 2012, the Journal of Analytical Toxicology of Oxford Press published a study on newer technology for testing of buprenorphine. It particularly used LC-MS/MS for confirmation. (Ref: http://jat.oxfordjournals.org/content/36/3/201.full)
The study talked about testing buprenorphine, in this case in the lab, at 10ng/mL. and 5 ng/mL. The study in particular addressed the testing of buprenorphine with enzyme immunoassay (EIA – the now prevalent testing methodology) as opposed to a process called CEDIA — a Microgenics process being used at the time. EIA testing became noted as the more accurate form of testing for buprenorphine as a result of this study.
However, the key factors noted about buprenorphine testing was that, when testing was done at the 5ng/mL. vs. the 10ng/mL. level, the agreement with LC-MS/MS confirmation was 4% higher at the 5ng/mL. level. And, the Journal mentioned that testing at even a lower level than the 5ng/mL. showed more positives that were considered correct.
But what is more interesting is the increased sensitivity related to testing buprenorphine at 5ng/mL.,vs. 10ng/mL. (Sensitivity is also shown as “precision” on many package inserts). According to the typical medical definition, “Test Sensitivity is a medical term defined as the ratio of true positive tests to the total number of affected (positive) patients tested expressed as a percentage. It measures a screening test’s ability to correctly identify the presence of a drug or disease. A test with high sensitivity has few false negatives.” So based on the study, the 5ng/mL. test would have fewer false negatives than a test at 10ng/mL. & would identify positives more accurately.
Since the 5ng/mL. cutoff reflected an 81% level of sensitivity in identifying positive results, as opposed to 67% for 10ng/mL. on lab testing – there were 14% less true positives identified by testing buprenorphine usage at 10ng/mL., or in other words more false negatives were reported for testing at the 10ng/mL. cutoff level.
In further relation to the reported study, Brigham & Women’s Hospital of the Harvard Medical School, had retained 95 specimens that they had tested in the study with either the old testing methodology or testing of buprenorphine at 10ng/mL. under EIA. (Ref: http://jat.oxfordjournals.org/content/36/3/201.full?sid=c2f8b15e-4b64-41a2-b712-792668093f9c)
The Hospital retested the 95 specimens using buprenorphine at 5ng/mL. and their comment below is what they recommended for their ongoing standard procedure moving forward:
“ At present, we recommend and are using a 5-ng/mL. cutoff, although an even lower EIA cutoff may be useful for detecting lower buprenorphine levels like those frequently detected in the urine of illicit users.”
Based on this study and others like it, the more effective level of testing for buprenorphine is to test at the 5ng/mL. level.